posted on
July 10, 2009 at 05:59PM
In response to
rcheid's post from
July 10 2009 11:45AM
Consumer Reports is not an infallible source; it's useful, but it also needs to be interpreted. For instance, they've got it in their heads at CR that price is an important factor in performance. It should be a separate criteria for ratings, rather than being factored in with performance. As a result, their ratings often have under-performing products rated higher than higher-performing products because of price. I think the price vs. performance compromise is something the consumer should decide, not the performance rating group.
That said, you're usually better off with Whirlpool's conventional laundry than GE's (Whirlpool laundry is also Kenmore conventional and Maytag conventional). The products are generally better performing, more reliable, and while the price is a little higher, you're getting a better quality machine.
Honestly, you're wasting your money replacing a $200 part on a machine that probably only cost $400-500. I'd recommend putting that $200 into a new washer made by Whirlpool if you want conventional top-load laundry, or into a Kenmore 48102 front-load washer if you're interested in dipping your toes into the high-efficiency waters.