posted on
January 31, 2010 at 11:09PM
Straight from my Torts and Civil Proceedings class:
__________
Suitable; just; proper; ordinary; fair; usual.
The term reasonable is a generic and relative one and applies to that which is appropriate for a particular situation.
In the law of negligence, the reasonable person standard is the standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would observe under a given set of circumstances. An individual who subscribes to such standards can avoid liability for negligence. Similarly a reasonable act is that which might fairly and properly be required of an individual.
__________
You know what that means? Nothing. Reasonable is the most relative term there could ever be. In a legal proceeding a "reasonable person" or a "reasonable act" is even defined as something a "reasonably" prudent person would do! At law, that would be the entire case, convincing the jury, judge, arbitrator, or whomever what was and wasn't reasonable.
At Sears, this is entirely different. Technically it isn't, as reasonable is still relative, but given that we are providing a service and the customer is in need of service, our ideas of reasonable are never going to be the same. Mostly this is due to the customer-retailer relationship, where the customer is generally going to think a retailer owes them the world for spending any amount of money with them.
I can't cite case law for you since I don't have access to Lexus or Westlaw Campus outside school, so hopefully you'll take my word for it, but there is PLENTY of precedence at common law for a "reasonable" amount of time to be anything within a month in most non-emergency situations.